30 June 2011

Tesco Site Working Hours

From: Andrew Ennis [mailto:AEnnis@eastdevon.gov.uk]
Sent: 29 June 2011 10:52
To: Nick Stephen
Cc: Cllr Mrs S C J Jones; Cllr J A Knight; Simon Smale; Cllr Peter Burrows; Andy Carmichael; Cllr I Thomas; Mr D Mears
Subject: Tesco Seaton Development - working hours - UNCLASSIFIED:

Dear All

RE: Tesco Seaton Development

A very small amount of site working outside the permitted hours was anticipated and has now been approved by the EHO. The justification is that the processes (continuous concrete pumping) and crane lifts require a continuous operation of around 11 hours so cannot be completed within the approved 08:00 to 18:00 period. None of this work will take place on Saturdays, Sundays or bank holidays. No vehicle movements of work activity will start before 07:00 and works will be completed not later than 18:30. The additional disruption for residents should therefore be minimal but the contractors have agreed that they will deliver a newsletter to households locally before Friday.

Agreed date earliest start time latest finish time reason

July

Friday 1st 07:00 18:30 set up (1 hour), continuous concrete pour (10 hours) and dismantle pump (30 minutes)

Tuesday 5th 07:00 18:30 set up (1 hour), continuous concrete pour (10 hours) and dismantle pump (30 minutes)

Friday 8th 07:00 18:30 set up (1 hour), continuous concrete pour (10 hours) and dismantle pump (30 minutes)

Weds 13th 07:00 18:30 set up (1 hour), continuous concrete pour (10 hours) and dismantle pump (30 minutes)

August

TBC 07:30 18:30 crane lifts – require either a 07:30 start or an 18:30 finish

TBC 07:30 18:30 crane lifts – require either a 07:30 start or an 18:30 finish

Andrew Ennis

Environmental Health Manager - Environmental Protection

East Devon District Council

Knowle

Sidmouth EX10 8HL

tel: 01395 571583

mobile: 07872 967 030

web: www.eastdevon.gov.uk


18 June 2011

Community Right to Buy in Jeopardy

Long shot, but do any of us have contacts in the House of Lords?
Hugh


Message from Steve Wyler
16 June 2011
Community Right to Buy in jeopardy
large_box_top.gif

Dear Hugh,

Steve Wyler
I am writing to ask if you can help with an urgent piece of lobbying. The Localism Bill is in the House of Lords and I have been tipped off that, as a result of scaremongering by the Countryside Landowners Association and others, the government is considering watering down the Community Right to Buy – for example reducing the window for community groups to prepare a bid to a mere 3 months.

Do you have any contacts in the House of Lords? – if so a personal email from you to them, enclosing Locality's briefing, would be very much appreciated. It would need to get there ideally today or tomorrow, or by the beginning of next week at the very latest. You can find out how to contact peers at the house of lords via http://www.theyworkforyou.com/peers/

You can also highlight this issue by following @localitynews on twitter and contributing to the debate using the tags #bigsociety, #righttobuy and #localism - or by signposting to Locality's blog post on this issue.

Thanks very much indeed.

Very many thanks

Steve Wyler
Chief Executive Officer, Locality

East Devon LDF Danger

This is not to do with Tesco at all, but I think it would be of interest to all TW members. The Development Trust will be pursuing it in conjunction with the Town Council.
Hugh

Dear All,

You will see from the statement here:

http://planningblog.wordpress.com/2011/06/16/your-verdict-the-draft-presumption-in-favour-of-sustainable-development/#more-3588

that if an area is NOT protected by a Local Plan, LDF or neighbourhood plan, the presumption will be that it is therefore development land and that it should be developed with maximum speed.

If East Devon does not get its LDF sorted soon and if Seaton does not get a neighbourhood plan sorted at the same time, all land in Seaton not covered in the LDF will be at risk, no matter what it is.

Regards
Sandra Semple

16 June 2011

EDDC Cabinet Meeting indecision on Underfleet toilets

A report from Hugh

Outcome disappointing but not disastrous. The decision on whether to demolish as proposed or to retain temporarily has been deferred till next Cabinet meeting in a month. Talk is of refurbishing or replacing with updated facilities: we will have to work very hard to avoid replacement by something like the West Walk toilets.
There was general sympathy with the need at this location, but uncertainty over whether the existing toilets could be retained without detriment to the overall public realm plan.
Asked for background to the issue, a Council officer chose to ignore reference to last night's discussion and decision at the Development Management Committee, and referred back to the decision of Cabinet in Dec. 09 to clear away the toilets with the other redundant buildings in order that nothing should mar the approach to Tesco store (other toilets were due to replace, but not provided by EDDC): he did not see that anything in the situation had changed, and said that the decision had been recorded on the website for anyone to see.
The Chair was at fault in not calling for a report of the previous night's decision, which was to approve the application in principle, but to delegate with a strong recommendation to retain the existing toilets and to look at making the street furniture and lighting more in keeping with Seaton generally and the tram station in particular.
The ward members, along with the Chair (and Vice-Chair, I think it was) were to be part of this consultation, but all of this was subject to a decision of Cabinet whether or not to reverse their decision of Dec. 09. The Tesco representatives had been shown Barbara's redrawing of the public realm, and were perfectly happy with it.
The DMC Chair, Mark Williamson, was eventually called and gave a potted version of this decision. Tonight's discusion was concluded by Coun. Graham Godbeer, who was in a position to say that the situation had changed, in that the building of the Visitor Centre had not yet got even a date, and the Cycle Hub funds had been withdrawn (both of these would have supplied public toilets).
In the course of discussion, several councillors had been in favour of retaining the toilets without further question: Peter Halse (Chair of the Council), Douglas Hull of Axminster, Jill Edson and our own Stephanie Jones had all spoken unequivocally (only the latter two were members of this committee; the other two had attended specifically to support the case, though they also had other matters to address later).
After the decision to defer decision, Mark Williamson (Chair of Development Management Committee) came outside to take me by the hand and ask me to convey to all the people who had come on the coach his appreciation of their attendance and their patience, sitting quietly through this long session. Peter Halse was very disappointed with their indecision, and thought that the Council Leader (Paul Diviani) with whom he had been in touch, would back him (i.e. in listening to public opinion}.
We just have to wait to see who wins. I wish I could have given a more satisfactory report.

7 June 2011

Underfleet Toilets Protest Meeting

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The Vicar has agreed to chair the Public Meeting on the demolition of the Underfleet toilets in Seaton Town Hall on Wednesday 8th June from 7 pm.

The Agenda and the graphics to be used by Seaton Development Trust are on the SDT website at http://www.seatondevtrust.org.uk/, go to Groups, then Public Realm.

See you on Wednesday.

James Semple

Tesco Site Noise


Email from Sandra Semple

Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:20 AM
Subject: Nosie and operating hours, Tesco site - Seaton

Dear Mr Wright,

I see from a letter on the planning application site 09/0019 that someone complained about noise coming from the Tesco site from piling. You replied, correctly, that there has been no piling so you say in your letter that there was therefore no particular source of unusual noise. There IS a source of noise similar to (or perhaps greater than) piling. There is a vibrating roller constantly working on the part of the site that will be occupied by the Tesco store. This vibrating roller (which has a decibel level greater than 100 according to Tesco's own documents) has been working most of the time from 8 am - 8 pm Monday - Saturday.

Initially, EDDC agreed that infill could take place at any time, 24 hours a day 7 days a week but said that after that Tesco would revert to "normal construction hours". This was put in writing by Ms Wallace of EDDC Environmental Health. However, as soon as the infill process ceased, EDDC gave Tesco permission to work 8 am - 8 pm to level the store site prior to construction of the store said to be commercing on 13 June 2011. After that (again, according to Ms Wallace and again in writing) normal construction hours (8 am - 6 pm Monday - Friday and 8 am - 1 pm Saturdays) are supposed to be in force unless there are exceptional circumstances.

Personally, I predict that normal construction hours will never happen. Tesco will continue to work whatever hours it wants and make whatever noise it wants, citing exceptional circumstances on a daily or weekly basis as it suits them. I think it unlikely that EDDC will do anything whatsoever to change this - it has shown no sign of being able to tame the Tesco tiger.

It might therefore be best not to make sweeping statements about there being no abnormal noise levels on the site. There have been abnormal noise levels, there continues to be abnormal noise levels and I have no doubt that such noise will continue at anti-social hours for many months to come.

Yours sincerely,
Sandra Semple

6 June 2011

SAVE ST CLARE'S AND SEATON TOILETS- HELP ME GET 500 SIGNATURES!

Message from Hugh and forwarded plea from Sophie O'Connell

These issues are related to most members' interests, and the issue of the Underfleet toilets is directly related to Tesco in that EDDC are asking Tesco to demolish them, which is not necessary for their access, and not particularly to their advantage (do they want to provide the public toilets for coach parties?). These issued are more a case of watching DCC and EDDC.
The forms for signature, if people are willing to sign them, need to be printed off and submitted to Town Council by June 10 (St.Clare's) or District Council by June 12 re toilets.
Hugh

From Sophie; her message refers to attached files which ofcourse are not attached here, so please contact Sophie on sophie.oconnell@sky.com to get hold of these.

Hi all,
I really need your help as Devon County Council and East Devon District Council are trying to take away St Clare's and the toilets at the Underfleet!
DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL WANT TO SELL ST CLARE'S on the open market and Seaton Town Council is being offered the chance to have it in either an asset transfer or for an agreed sum. Seaton Town Council have a meeting on MONDAY JUNE 13TH AT 7.30PM to decide if Seaton will keep or lose St Clare's once and for all. I have attached a copy of a form which asks for residents to support keeping St Clare's for Seaton's community and not have it sold onto developers.
I have also attached a poster for a protest meeting on Wednesday June 8th at 7pm in Seaton Town Hall arranged by Seaton Development Trust and Sustainable Seaton to make sure we stop the TOILETS ON THE UNDERFLEET CAR PARK from being demolished bye EDDC and Tesco.
There is a petition that you can sign online to save the Underfleet toilets http://www.petitiononline.com/sosasset/petition.html

or you can print off the attached "SAVE THE UNDERFLEET TOILETS" word document to get your friends and family to sign.
IN TOTAL WE NEED 500 SIGNATURES TO HAVE ANY CHANCE OF SAVING THE TOILETS
Below is a link to the SAVE ST CLARE'S group where you will get regular updates on what is happening with the UNDERFLEET TOILETS AND ST CLARE'S. http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_124353947645650&id=124372057643839
I have also attached a PDF file designed to be printed off and posted up in windows, cars, shop fronts, or even taken to meetings. Hopefully this will help spread the message showing East Devon and Devon County that we will not be pushed around any longer and that we deserve to keep our tourists and community facilities!
FINALLY .....
PLEASE, PLEASE FORWARD YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY AS WE REALLY NEED ALL THE SUPPORT WE CAN GET!!!!!
Thank you!

2 June 2011

Water Polution Reporting

Message from Hugh Barlow, 1st June. This first message is important and invites your contribution when you have anything to report. The various messages following are there to give you the background on how this came about.

I met Doug Parker today as arranged. He is the Environment Agency officer responsible for water quality, and in this capacity is a regular visitor to this site, among others in Seaton and elsewhere.

It was a pleasure to meet a professional person who welcomes public watchfulness.

Contractors do not usually contact the Agency if they have a problem, but they are obliged to keep the Agency informed once the EA has been alerted, and remedial action or continued monitoring is required by the Agency (Doug is visiting weekly anyway). So they are reliant on the public for informing them of any disconcerting new observations.

He was alerted to the flooding of the tramway car park flower bed, and had asked the site manager to provide a sump just inside the site boundary: once the tidally affected groundwater level had lowered, and the salt water off the site had begun to go down, this had the effect of lowering it more rapidly, until all that was visible was the white deposit on the asphalt and in the flower bed. We discussed this on the very spot.

We inspected the ditches alongside the tramway, and went far enough to see how impossibly silted up the outlet to the estuary is (the outlet is visible in his pictures, under the tramway bridge). This is the responsibility of the County Council, but discussion with Natural England led to the postponement of the clearance last year during the birds' breeding season. He is now concerned that it has still not been done, and may become urgent even in the breeding season, if warmer weather leads to the growth of the potentially toxic blue-green kind of algae.

Currently, all that is visible in the stagnant water is ordinary blue (almost petrol-blue) algae, and ochre staining (which might be iron stain from the site, but is more likely from a local ground source).
He himself is not a flooding expert, but would recognise a potential flooding problem, and will already have advised his colleague Steve Moore of the blocked outlet.

So Doug would like, from any local observations, preferably
photos of any of the following in the ditches:
  • bright blue salt water
  • blue-green algae
  • bright ochre tinting.
  • serious mosquito infestation
The first is now unlikely to recur, the second is quite possible, the last two are possibilities. Basically, any startling change of colour is worth notifying, because it could indicate serious pollution.
He is also concerned with the Harbour View pumping station, which is close to full capacity. Any blockage there could cause a backflow leading to raised manhole covers. If anyone sees sewage leaking into the water courses, they should contact him immediately and he will try to be on site in thirty minutes. This obviously applies anywhere and not just in the Tesco site. Most of these are problems
of the low-lying ground, and have nothing specifically to do with Tesco.
Problems which happen to be thrown up by the Tesco development are not the only problems, but we are being educated in public awareness. I was given to believe that, on some issues at least, the public will be taken seriously.
Hugh
I have Doug's e-mail address, and the Environment Agency is in the phone book.

From: Doug Parker
To: Hugh Barlow
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:50 PM
Subject: FW: Harbour Road Development Site - Seaton

Dear Mr Barlow,
Thank you for your observations, as this is our first contact I will explain my role in this development. As a basic Environment Officer I cover various areas from Water Quality, Water Resources to Waste and Fisheries Enforcement. I have been aware of the old camp site for several years and more so now with the new development starting with me visiting the site during the demolition phase, checking that all the various types of waste were disposed of correctly, then the monitoring of the returning sea water and now I monitor water quality discharges that leave the site. My main area of interest for now is the water quality of the local watercourses around the site, then once construction starts I will also check their disposal routes of all their packaging and building waste.
Please see the attached photos which were taken on Friday the 20th of May, reference your concerns about the outlet to the estuary. I believe that this part of the drainage ditch has not been maintained by the LA for over 18 months plus see below part of an email which I sent to EDDC only last week.

Regards
Doug Parker
EO - EM East Devon


From:
Hugh Barlow
To:
Steve Moore
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: Harbour Road, Seaton: infill consequences

Steve
Thanks for passing this to Doug Parker. Can I through you relay to him my corrected observations?
The berm was not, as I thought at one stage, covered over (I had misread a couple of photographs taken from the tramway by a colleague), but it was clearly overwhelmed by the initial squeezing of sand and water out of the fill and into the ditch. Along the other sides of the development, and clearly visible from the tramway by the car park, the sand heap reaches right to the ditch, and sand obviously blows or is washed directly into the ditch with nothing to prevent it.
At least until the sand is fixed by grass, this situation will continue, the ditches will be clogged with sand, and the salinity of the adjacent area increased. What happens in the event of a major rainstorm?
The increase in the salinity of the groundwater and of the ditches must eventually affect a wider area, and I am not sure what the impact is on the outlet to the estuary.
I should be glad to know what you make of these concerns.
Hugh Barlow


From: Steve Moore, to Hugh Barlow, Doug Parker, May 24th

Hugh , apologies for not getting back to you last week but I've been either on training or on holiday since you wrote.
In general terms I comment upon flooding related matters in relation to planning applications for a number of Councils My involvement therefore typically ends when a planning permmission is granted. It is then for the planning authority to ensure the dev't is built or any 'conditions' are carried out to the satisfaction of the Council. Matters relating to site runoff, water quality , impact upon the wider water environment , etc , are typically dealt with by my colleagues in Environment Protection . In this case Doug Parker is the chap who looks after such matters in Seaton and as such I've forwarded your e-mail to Doug for his information and/or action. I trust this is of assistance . Please feel free to get back to me if I can help you further.
kind regards Steve.
Doug, over to you for action / update to Hugh. Please give me ring if I can be of any assistance to you. Steve.


From: Hugh
Sent: 19 May 2011 10:38
To: Moore, Steve
Cc: James Semple
Subject: Harbour Road, Seaton: infill consequences


Dear Steve
I am content that various consultancies and agencies, including the Environment Agency, are monitoring and advising on site, but I would be interested to know how you view specific aspects of the current state of progress.
As I see it, a gravel-filled berm was constructed per plan between the raised site and the boundary rhyne, but the raised area has been extended over this berm. As it stands, then, there is nothing to prevent sand-laden water from the saturated fill from draining directly into the rhyne and clogging it up, as appears to have happened already. What remedial measures can be taken or have such already been recommended?
Thank you for your continued interest in this difficult development.
Yours sincerely
Hugh Barlow
Chair, Seaton Development Trust